Driving Under the Influence (DUI)

A conviction for Driving Under the Influence (“DUI”) of either alcohol or a controlled substance in Pennsylvania can lead to jail time, loss of your driving privileges, and significant fines. For many, the penalties associated with DUI cases can lead to substantial hardship in both their personal and professional lives.

The law pertaining to DUI cases is constantly evolving. This is because these types of cases often involve legal issues pertaining to the illegal seizure of evidence—i.e., blood samples and breathalyzer results—along with scientific issues relating to the operation of the breathalyzer equipment and proper forensic testing of blood samples.

A skilled attorney who is knowledgeable in the area of DUI law can spare you mandatory jail time and the loss of your license. Mr. Kadish has been recognized as an Executive Member of the American Association of Premier DUI Attorneys. Contact him today for assistance in obtaining the best possible outcome in your DUI case.

Not Guilty – Philadelphia Firearms Case

Commonwealth v. A.H.

Client was charged with illegal possession of a firearm and several charges related to the firearm charge. The police alleged that they observed client place an item in the rear compartment of a sport-utility vehicle. At trial, Mr. Kadish elicited testimony from the police that any movement made by client in the vehicle would have been incredibly difficult for police to observe.

Result: Client acquitted of all charges.

All Charges Withdrawn – Philadelphia Drug Case

Commonwealth v. S.S.

Client accused of possessing a large amount of crack, with the intent to deliver, along with drug paraphernalia and a firearm. During a motion to suppress drugs, drug paraphernalia and a gun found during a search, Mr. Kadish demonstrated that the police entered the bedroom without a search warrant or valid exception to the warrant requirement.

Result – Commonwealth withdrew all charges.

Not Guilty – Murder, Assault & Firearms Case

Commonwealth v. G.M.

Client charged with Attempted Murder, Aggravated Assault, and Firearms charges after a shooting inside a diner. During trial, Mr. Kadish’s cross-examination of police and witnesses called into question the identification of client as the shooter. Closer examination by Mr. Kadish of the recovered videotape showed client fleeing from the scene along with other patrons, without a firearm.

Result: Client acquitted on all charges.

FREE CONSULTATIONS

    Top Rated Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer, 2017-2023

    Philadelphia Criminal Defense Lawyer
    Law Office of Jason C. Kadish, PLLC BBB Business Review